Posts Tagged ‘Facebook’

Yellow Pages, Search Engines or Social Media, Who Do You Trust?

Tuesday, June 14th, 2011
Yell, Google, Bing, Facebook and Twitter

Who do you trust when searching for local businesses?

I read an interesting article today that claims that people trust The Yellow Pages more than they do search engines like Google, Bing and Yahoo. It is a US based survey but it claims that 84% of those who took part in the survey used The Yellow Pages to find a local business in the last year against 76% who used a search engine. Only 32% said that they used a social network such as Facebook and Twitter.

So why would this be? I think a lot of it might come down to The Yellow Pages being a longer established brand. If we are honest if you were looking for something back in the mid nineties then pretty much your only option was to use The Yellow Pages. Search engines were still a relatively new idea and it was relatively easy to manipulate their results. Add to that many local businesses did not have a web presence in those days so you had little option but to go for The Yellow Pages.

As time has passed then search engine algorithms have become more sophisticated and so their results are more relevant. Local businesses are all waking up to the fact that having a website, even in its most basic form, is a requirement nowadays. The Yellow Pages have not been idle though and they now have a strong online presence through yell.com.

The statistics quoted earlier are for both online and print versions of The Yellow Pages so that perhaps skews the figures slightly as you cannot get a paper version of Google or Bing. I think that it is a valid figure though as I have to confess that last year I needed a tree surgeon and I had already picked up The Yellow Pages and was thumbing through it before I thought to myself “Why am I not looking for this online?”

I should hang my head in shame at the reason I did not go online initially to conduct my search. My thought pattern was that I probably wouldn’t find a small business online and a quicker option would probably be to use The Yellow Pages. The point I am trying to make is that even though I work in new media and deal with local businesses every day, help to promote their businesses online every day I still thought I would have a greater choice out of The Yellow Pages. Oh, and it was the paper copy of The Yellow Pages, not the website that I was using. I did put my copy down and start to search online instead, with a good result I might add.

This shows how much we are creatures of habit. I used the paper copy because that is what I have always done. I had never even thought about searching on line for a local company prior to that. I do now always search online when looking for goods and services, but if it has taken me this long to get round to using the web how long will it take more casual internet users?

One other thought I had on these figures was that of trust. Figures are constantly being bandied about that only about a third of users will click on the paid for ads on a search engine result page (SERP). Yet The Yellow Pages is full of nothing but ads. The Yellow Pages do not do anything to check or endorse companies it is simply a directory and the company pays for their ad and chooses which section they want to be listed in. We all know that when we use The Yellow Pages we tend to choose the companies whose ads stand out the most. This is no objective way of choosing a company, Company A have a more eye catching ad than Company B and therefore Company A must be better than Company B. I wonder if over time people will start to trust paid for ads on SERP’s? One comment I heard a few weeks ago was from somebody who only clicks on the ads and their rationale was that if a company is prepared to pay for me to click on their link then they must be serious about wanting to do business with me.

Perhaps this sort of view is going to become more prevalent in the coming years and it may very well be worth local businesses start to consider using services like Google Adwords or Microsoft adCenter for Bing. The advantage for advertisers is that you can choose which search terms you want your ad to appear under, meaning really targeted advertising.

Only 32% said that they used social media to search for a local company. I believe that this is primarily because social media is where search engines where ten years ago. People know that they exist, they use them, but they do not yet trust their search results enough to go to these sites first when looking for goods and services. People are still more interested in being sociable with their friends rather than with brands or businesses. It will be up to businesses to offer something in return for liking their Facebook page or following their Twitter account. It is also fait to say that while most household names are on one or both of the major social networks many smaller businesses have not yet moved into the social space.

The growth of mobile may spur the development of local searches on line. Often when you are searching for a local product you are searching for a telephone number to speak to somebody and so it follows that having your telephone number in a clickable format on your ad or webpage is likely to help contact rates from prospective customers. They can find your business via a search engine and then being able to click on the telephone number will be easier than keying it in. Of course yell.com can also provide this functionality via their website too.

I have been so intrigued by the results of this survey that I have set up my own on my home page. You will find it half way down the page, please do answer the single question and let’s see if our results are the same here in the UK.

  • Share/Bookmark

Happy IPv6 Day

Wednesday, June 8th, 2011

Happy IPv6 DayEveryday seems to be designated a special day. There are literally hundreds of them with greater or lesser importance, there’s probably an” International Eat A Cake Day”. Today has been designated International IPv6 Day, which may sound a lot less interesting but will have a much greater effect on you than you may realise.

What’s IPv6 and why are we having a special day for it you may well be asking. Well it is one of those moments in time when we realise that we have totally underestimated something, a bit like when Bill Gates allegedly said “640K of RAM ought to be enough for anybody”. In this case we are talking about the number of IP addresses that can exist. An IP address is a unique number that is assigned to an individual device that is connected to the Internet, “IP” stands for Internet Protocol. The reason that we need IP addresses is so that individual devices can communicate with each other. If you send an email to me then you, and I, want to know that it will arrive on my machine and not somebody else’s. The IP address helps to alleviate this problem.

A good analogy would be the telephone system. Your house will probably have a landline. Notice I have said “probably”, I have been careful to use that word so some of my more pedantic friends do not start bombarding me with emails to say that they don’t have a landline and simply use their mobile device to do everything.  I’m starting to ramble, so let’s get back to the gripping subject of IP addresses…

You probably have a landline in your house and that telephone is assigned a specific telephone number so when I dial your number I know that the phone in your house will ring. IP addresses are very similar in nature. Websites are all assigned an IP address that will look something like 192.185.75.12, now trying to remember that type of number for every website you visit would not be easy so we instead use domain names and every domain name maps to a specific IP address. These are more like the way you store telephone numbers in your mobile, you don’t need to know the number we just choose the name because we remember names more easily than telephone numbers.

The problem that we currently have is that we are running out of IP addresses. IPv4, the current version can support approximately 4.3 billion addresses, which may sound like a lot but when you think that every device that is connected to the internet is allocated an IP address then you might be surprised that they have lasted this long. Think about how many devices you have? PC’s, Mac’s, Tablets, Netbooks, Printers, iPads, smartphones and more devices are able to connect to the Internet on a daily basis and all the IPv4 addresses are now accounted for, though they have not yet all been allocated. With the emerging technology markets of China and Africa meaning that literally billions of new devices will go online in the next few years then it is apparent that something needs to change and change fast.

Enter IPv6. This is a protocol that will allow far more items to be allocated IP addresses 3.4 trillion trillion trillion to be exact and they should keep us going for a good while longer. The purpose of today was to test the new system. Many major players on the web including Facebook, Google and Yahoo have signed up to take part in the day. Taking part means that these sites will provide versions of their sites that can be accessed either using IPv4 or IPv6. Most browsers and PC’s should have no problem accessing sites that use IPv6 but some routers may do. You can see if you will be affected by running the test that can be found at test-ipv6.com.

The test will run from 01:00 BST on 08 June 2011 until 01:00 BST on 09 June 2011. The time now is 18:19 and so far no major issues have been reported, but we may not know for sure until the techies have poured over their stats in the next couple of days.

In reality this is probably less exciting than the supposed Rapture that was supposed to happen a couple of weeks ago but potentially this could have more of an impact on you, me and everybody else in the online world.

If you have experienced anything, good or bad, regarding IPv6 Day then why not leave me a comment?

  • Share/Bookmark

How Facebook Can Take Over The World… Well The Online World

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011
Facebook Currency Logo

Can Facebook Really Take Over The Web?

There is an awful lot made of the battle between Facebook and Google for dominance of the web and I have argued for some time that Facebook will eventually win this battle. The reason that I have argued that the social media giant will defeat Google is because people live inside of Facebook, people tend not to do the same with Google. I know that if you have a Google profile and you use Google Docs and Gmail then you might argue that you DO live in Google, but the number of people that do that is miniscule compared to those who sit on Facebook all day.

I admit that Google is the most popular search engine and that it is still the most popular site on the web, but Facebook is catching up. At their heart each site serves a different purpose. With Google you are tending to find out about things, you conduct a search and then click on the links that entice you the most. When you look at the Searc h Engine Results Page (SERP) then Google displays the ads that keep Google going. With Facebook users do not leave the ecosystem, they are effectively a captive audience and Facebook keeps drip feeding ads to their users. At this time the Facebook ad click through rate is not very high in comparison to that achieved with Google Adwords, but this may be as much to do with the fact that the ads work in a slightly different way.

With Adwords your ad will appear when specified keywords are searched for and those keywords are highlighted, helping to draw your eye to the ad. By choosing a keyword to trigger the ad you have a very targeted ad campaign. With Facebook advertising your ad is triggered by demographics, location, gender, age etc and none of the text is highlighted which means you are less likely to have your eye drawn to the ad and your ad will appear to a lot of users who will have no interest in your product or service.

I think that marketers have yet to discover the true power of Facebook advertising, personally I believe that the ads that will work are most likely to be for local businesses who can get a message out to their local audience.

We keep seeing a cosier relationship developing between Facebook and Bing, the search engine from Microsoft. This week Bing have announced in a blog post that they will start to give a higher weighting to pages with Facebook “Likes” than they have done before. I can see this integration between Facebook and Bing increasing as it is in both their interests to take on Google. Especially when you consider that a 1% market share of the search market is estimated to be worth $1 billion. I used to think that eventually Facebook would buy Bing to try to provide a full search facility to compete with Google, but now I have changed my mind.

If Facebook could integrate Bing fully into its ecosystem what would the real benefit be? Yes, they would get some of that search market share but does that really help to advance Facebook? Not really, Facebook like you to just exist inside of Facebook, not start going off to other sites, so how can they take over the online world?

The first sign of this may have already happened. On 07 April 2011 Facebook announced the Open Compute Project. This is a project that has created new server technology that boasts that it is 38% more energy efficient and 24% cheaper to build and run the servers than in traditional data centres.

This means that Facebook may eventually start to offer relatively cheap web space to companies. This on its own will not take over the online world but if Facebook could offer a shopping cart and payment gateway then they could. Imagine a scenario where you are offered a hosting platform that allows you to sell online to all those people on Facebook. You might have a traditional business such as being a mens clothes shop in Blackburn. You want to sell online but know that it will be very difficult to compete with larger retailers in a national market but that you have a good name in your local area for offering quality and value. Now think about what I said abolut Facebook Advertising being led by demographics. Our shopkeeper in Blackburn can target that his ads only show to males aged between 18 and 30 who live within 10 miles of Blackburn who are interested in fashion. The people that see the ad may well know about the business already but may not be aware that there is an end of season sale on right now.

With the system that I am proposing you will still have your Facebook business page but as well as the usual features such as your wall and photos you can have a store section that allows you to sell your goods directly to other Facebook users.

From the users perspective as the system grows then you will start to search within Facebook for the goods and services that you require. Over time people will use traditional search engines less and less and more worryingly for the search engines advertisers will buy ads less and less.

Facebook already have Facebook credits that allow users to buy credits from Facebook that can be used to buy virtual goods within Facebook games. All I am proposing is that this system is expanded. Users would pay for their credits and then trade these with the store, the store can then redeem the credits and download the cash into their bank account. This means that there is no chance of chargebacks for the business as Facebook will be guaranteeing the money.

Admittedly this leaves Facebook susceptible to chargebacks, but they can then employ the best security people and deploy the best security systems to help protect themselves.

There is another great advantage for Facebook, people will be handing over their cash to buy the Facebook currency. This means that Facebook get to keep the money for a little while, invest it and earn a little bit of interest on it in the process. On an individual basis this may not be much but when you think about 600 million users then there is the potential for Facebook to get its hands on an awful lot of currency. If Facebook were a country of 600 million then only China and India would have a greater population.

You could potentially end up where Facebook credits become an internationally recognised currency like the dollar, pound sterling, Euro and Yen.

So this is my vision, people get up in the morning and check Facebook, not just to see what their friends are doing but to check the status of the order that they placed the night before.  They might do a little bit of shopping before breakfast, they might even order breakfast via Facebook. They will be able to search not just for friends but for specialist businesses such as wedding planners, yoga teachers and insurance without ever leaving Facebook.

One day people might well ask “Do you remember Google?” and the reply “Yeah, what was it they did again?” The Social Network may well become The Commercial Network.

Pound Symbol

  • Share/Bookmark

Internet World (Day 1) Round Up

Tuesday, May 10th, 2011

20110510-225533.jpgToday was the first day of Internet World the annual expo for all things web related held at Earls Court, London. There were two things that seemed to be most in evidence one was cloud computing with plenty of suppliers of cloud based services, all of whom gave slightly different versions of what cloud computing entailed and the other thing that was in evidence was queueing!

I did not attend any of the talks that I had originally planned on going to, but that was not necessarily a bad thing as I ended up attending five extremely interesting talks. The day was a little fatiguing due to the amount of queuing, on one occasion I queued for an hour to listen to a talk that lasted 20 minutes.

OK, enough of the moaning let me tell you about the good stuff. My first talk was “The Unsocial Web” by Siddharth Jhunjhunwala of Web Spiders. The crux of Sids talk was that individuals and brands can expend too much effort in chasing friends/followers on various social media networks thinking that high numbers must mean that they are doing something right. What Sid argued was that as numbers increase so engagement decreases. He claimed that as numbers increase so the value of the individual decreases. To emphasise the point he used the analogy that when in a city people will walk past each other and say nothing, but if in a jungle if one of those person came across another person they would start to talk. I think this was a great way to get the point across. Too many brands are talking and too few are actually listening, which in my opinion is very conceited of them.

My next session was Graham Wilkinson’s from Just Search. This was quite a short session and looked at ways that organisations can harness some of the free tools that are available on the web to help build up a content management strategy in social media. This was not a talk about using Facebook and Twitter. Rather it was how you can use tools such as Social Mention and Double Click Ad Planner to work out what people are saying about your brand or product and where your target audience hangs out on the web.

After a spot of lunch I headed to a talk given by Dave Edmundson-Bird from Manchester Metropolitan University. It was quite apparent that Dave is a lecturer as heis talk was the most interesting, not necessarily in the sense that the content was any better than the other but more in the way that it was delivered. Dave talked Emerging Trends in Digital Marketing. One of the main points that he made was that there is a convergence in design, search and social. That organisations need to get their advisors on these three disciplines together at the start of a project rather than following on from each other. This will enable the organisation to develop a co-ordinated strategy for their online activity and will also reduce costs and friction.

Webcredible gave a talk on designing mobile friendly sites. The talk was more than just using a browser detection script to present your site content in a narrower column than ususal. That you need to look at trying to minimise user input as mobile devices are not really designed for anything other than very light keyboard use. In case you were wondering I can confirm now that this article is being written in a hotel room but that the input device is a laptop and not a smartphone!

My final talk was possibly the most illuminating. It was given by Andy Henshaw, CEO of Vee24. I only attended the talk because another I had planned to attend had started early. With hindsight I am so glad that it did as Andy’s talk backed up many things that I already believe about online behaviour and also gave me a glimpse of what will undoubtedly become a very popular feature of e-commerce sites in the next couple of years. Andy was talking about live video chat on websites. The idea is that if you are on a site then you generally do not have the opportunity to quiz anybody about the products and services that are available in real time. Andy showed stats that online conversion is between 3-4% while in store conversion is between 15-20%.

This has set me to thinking. If you went back in time 100 years then your local grocer would provide you with a very tailored service. You would walk into the shop and receive personal service from an individual. In the sixties and seventies we saw the rise of supermarkets, here the service was less personal but the tradeoff was in lower prices. You still had somebody that you could turn to and ask questions. With the rise of online shopping at the end of the nineties this function of questioning disappeared. Yes you could email the company, but to maximise sales you need to engage with the customer when the interest is highest. With live video chat you still get all the advantages of online shopping but you can also get that more personal touch that has been lost over the years. The fact that it is video means that it is a lot more instant than when you take part in a live text chat, no matter how fast you can type I will guarantee that you can talk faster.

The show itself has hundreds of stands offering a wide variety of services. I am going to decide whose stand was the best, in my opinion, on Friday morning. One early contender is Eazy Tiger. Their stand was one of the smallest but they used an X Box 360 with Kinnetic controller to play a football type game, the palyer with the highest score at the end of the show will win a prize.

I would also like to mention Kyle and the team from BoxPay who are a company that provide a payment solution where instead of giving your credit card details you simply pay via a text message charged to your mobile phone. I think that this is likely to be a real growth area over the next few years. People are going to become more and more reluctant to hand over their card details to companies due to issues about the security of their personal data. We only need to look at recent events with Sony to see what can happen when things go wrong. BoxPay can also be used for recurring billing to subscription sites and is definitely worth considering if you are looking for an alternative way of charging your customers. At this time there is a £10.00 transaction limit but they are looking at increasing the maximum transaction value.

All in all I have had an enjoyable day, but now it is time to recharge my phone, my digital camera, my video camera and most of all myself. Night all, and I will see you at the show tomorrow.

  • Share/Bookmark

The UK’s Alternative Voting Referendum on the Web

Wednesday, May 4th, 2011

The logos for the No and Yes CampaignsHere in the UK we are about to have a referendum on whether or not to change the way that we elect our M.P.s and so the Government. Traditionally we have used a first past the post system where the candidate who polls the most votes is declared the winner. This means that if there are nine candidates, one polls 20% of the vote and the others get 10% each then the candidate with 20% of the vote is declared the winner. With the proposed Alternative Vote system you would vote for the candidates in order of preference, if no candidate has an overall majority then the one with the least number of votes will have their second choices counted. This will continue until somebody gets a majority.

I have no intention of trying to use my Blog to exert any form of influence one way or the other, after all who would pay any attention to my political thoughts? I have been interested in how the referendum is playing out in the social sphere and on the web.
I started out by doing a search on Google for “Alternative vote referendum”. There is a sponsored link from The Electoral Commission to the site www.aboutmyvote.co.uk. I found this site to be very informative and has a great little video which explains how both systems work. There is also an option to share the video via Facebook, but no option to share the video via Twitter.

About My Vote website

The About My Vote Website

Out of the organic search results on Google all but one of the first page of results are from various news organisations explaining how the two systems work. The only link that was from either the Yes or No camps was for www.yestofairvotes.org. They seem to be using a variety of media within their site. There are links to both videos and photos. The videos are on YouTube but the photos are hosted on their own site. This surprised me as I would have thought a Flickr stream may have been beneficial both from a search engine optimisation perspective and also from the fact that it would be another way of engaging with people. There is also a link to the Yes To Fair Votes Facebook page (www.facebook.com/YestoFairerVotes) that at the time of writing had 15 755 likes. There is also a Twitter stream with the username @YesInMay that currently has 7978 followers.

The first site that I came across for the No campaign was at the bottom of page 2 of the Google search results with www.no2av.org/04/referendum-broadcast/. This is a YouTube hosted video that comments on the reasons why the AV system would not be beneficial. As with the Yes vote they also have a Facebook page (www.facebook.com/NO2AV) that at the time of writing had 10 785 likes. They have also utilised Twitter, unlike the Yes camp, with @NO2AV and 5404 followers. They also have a YouTube channel. Again they are hosting their own photos rather than using something like Flickr. There is also a blog on the site but this does not seem to have been updated that much, which is a pity as this would have helped them with their Search Engine Optimisation efforts. One really great feature of the site is the advocates page (www.no2av.org/advocates/), this has a Google map and as the seconds tick by photos of people who have pledged to vote “no” are dropped onto it. You can zoom into the map which is interesting in itself as it possibly shows where the most support is for the No campaign. Of course this would be a far from scientific way of predicting where the No campaign will do well as there is nothing comparable on the Yes campaign’s site.

From this cursory glance at what is happening on the web you might be tempted to think that the Yes campaign will win the referendum, based on the fact that they have both more support on both Facebook and Twitter. However, it is worth noting that there is more support for the No campaign among the older generation. These people are less likely to be engaging in social media but are more likely to vote. We will know the result in the next couple of days but it has certainly been an interesting campaign, online at least.

I am already celebrating the referendum, it has given me a subject for my 100th blog post!

  • Share/Bookmark

Facebook Business Pages Can Now Ban You

Thursday, April 21st, 2011
Spambook? Let's hope not

Spambook? Let's hope not

Facebook seem to be constantly rolling out new features at the moment. A few weeks ago they allowed administrators of Facebook Business Pages to post material as the page on other people/businesses walls. This meant that you could potentially access new markets to pass on your message.

There is a flipside to this though and that is that other pages could now post material to your wall and appear in your fans newsfeeds. With everybody being able to post anything pretty much anywhere for free then you do not have to be a genius to realise that there is the potential for an awful lot of spamming to go on.

In fact for those that attempt to use Twitter for marketing purposes think about what your Twitter stream is like. Everybody’s talking but does anyone actually listen? How much engagement actually takes place on Twitter? My Twitter stream appears to be full of links to articles that I have little or no interest in.

I suspect that Facebook were fearful that their social media platform would turn into the worlds largest spam site and that in turn user engagement for the site as a whole would drop. With this in mind Facebook have now enabled page admins to be able to not just remove a post but to also ban the user, even if that user is a business page.  I posted something earlier to my business page so that I could demonstrate the sort of options that you now have.

New Feature That Allows Facebook Page Admins Can Now Ban Users

New Feature That Allows Facebook Page Admins Can Now Ban User

I think that this is a smart move for Facebook. The social media giant have always said that they will never charge people to become part of Facebook and, therefore, they need to be able to talk about their large user base to be able to attract the advertisers they need to become a sustainable business long term.

In the same way that Google gets search so Facebook gets social. Although both do make mistakes from time to time they both realise that the service needs to be free for users and that it needs to provide high quality content.

If your companies Facebook marketing strategy has previously been to just post the same message on hundreds of other pages then now might be the time to think again. However, as much as I applaud what Facebook has done I do feel that it will only be a matter of time before Facebook spammers just use different ways to go about their business, such as setting up multiple profiles that are tied to spoofed email addresses. This does not mean that I think we should just accept spam, on the contrary we all have to work at just making things that little bit more difficult for the spammers to operate so that it is not quite as cost effective for them to operate.

I would love to hear about your own experiences of using all forms of social media as a marketing tool, feel free to leave a comment or two!

  • Share/Bookmark

New Find Friend Feature on Facebook

Tuesday, April 19th, 2011

Last week Facebook rolled out a new feature to help you find friends and make new contacts on the worlds most popular social network. You can see the new feature on the top right hand part of the menu bar next to the Account button. It is called Find Friends.

New Find Friends Feature on Facebook

The new Find Friends Feature is next to the existing Account button

When you click on the link you are taken through to a page with people that you may possibly know that is based on your current set of friends. The more of them that are friends with an individual the higher up the listing they will come, which makes sense as somebody who is friends with 20 of your other friends is likely to be somebody that you already know.

The main part of the screen is split into a grid showing a picture of the person, their name and how many mutual friends they have. On the left hand side of the page are a set of filters that allow you to set parameters such as your Hometown, Employer etc.

New Find Friends Result page

Sample Find Friends page on Facebook

People that are in your blocked list do not show up, so you don’t have to look at your stalkers and ex’s!

I have had the feature for the best part of a week now and although I think that it is potentially a useful tool I am not totally convinced of the need for it. My thought would be that if I ever want to trace somebody I use the search function. Perhaps it will be of more use to those who have just joined Facebook and are looking for a way to contact a large number of people in a short space of time, or those who believe that a measure of ones standing in society is directly proportional to the number of friends that you have on Facebook.

  • Share/Bookmark

Weekly Round Up 19th March 2011

Saturday, March 19th, 2011

This is the first in a new series I will be adding to the Blog in which I give a quick once over to some of the more interesting stories I have come across in the preceding week with a link through to the original article. Feel free to leave your comments about each story that has been in the news.

iPhone 5 to have Near Field Communication(NFC)?

iPhone 5 rumoured to be getting NFC technology

Will you soon be able to make payments using your iPhone?

Rumours are gathering pace that the iPhone 5 may have NFC (Near Field Communication). This is the system that allows pinless payment transactions to take place. At the moment the only major company offering this type of service in the UK are Barclaycard. You are able to make a payment by simply holding your NFC enabled credit card close to the payment terminal and do not need to enter a PIN number. The transaction is automatic. Barclaycard currently limit the maximum payment amount using this technology to £15.00. This suggests that they are minimising the risk of fraudulant transactions that could take place. Will this be a good technology to use in the iPhone? Possibly, at the recent SXSW conference in Austin Texas one of the most popular apps in use was one named “Uber”. This allows users to hail a cab from their iPhone. Cab drivers with the Uber app receive updates that somebody is waiting to be picked up and they can go and collect the user. The user then pays for the cab ride within the app. While this is not NFC technology the fact that so many people were prepared to use it would suggest that there is a demand for this type of transaction. One other point is that NFC technology makes payments easier and therefore is likely to lead to increased sales. Who remembers student days where you felt if you paid by card rather than cash it was like you had not really spent anything?

http://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-5-might-have-nfc-chip-after-all-2011-3?op=1
European Union Warns US Giants They Must Comply With Upcoming Privacy Laws
The European Union has told companies such as Google and Facebook that they must comply with soon to be implemented data privacy laws or face court action. One the new rules will be a users “right to be forgotten”. This means that you would not only be able to deactivate an account on Facebook as you can now but can actually delete the account and in the process remove all images of yourself. This sounds like a good idea, but implementing it may be a nightmare. Deleting photos that you have uploaded to Facebook is one thing, but what if you have been tagged in a photo uploaded by somebody else? Does that person have to delete their picture of you? Another development is the fact that tracking cookies must be explicitly accepted by a user before they can be set on your machine. Google Analytics stores five separate tracking cookies on a users machine. This legislation, due to be introduced at the end of May could have profound implications on the accuracy of data from Google Analytics. However do not panic just yet. The European Union’s justice chief has already said that the laws will not be fully implemented upon introduction and companies will be given time to comply with the new regulations.
http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/110317-151000
Curebit Adds Social Media to Online Shopping
Curebit is a new social service that will integrate with many shopping carts and provides the ability to generate sales through social media sharing. The quick pitch for how the service works is as follows. A user makes a purchase from a site, when the order is placed the user receives an on screen referral offer. The user is given the option to share the offer with their friends via social media. If those friends purchase something via the link then the original user is credited with something such as cashback or a discount.
http://mashable.com/2011/03/17/curebit/
  • Share/Bookmark

App Review: Vlingo (iPhone & Android)

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011
Vlingo on the iPhone

Vlingo on the iPhone

Vlingo is a nifty little app that allows you to search the web, update social networks, write texts and emails using your voice as the input method. The way it works is that the first word you utter tells the app what you want to do. For example, if you say “Search Freelance Web Design Blackburn” then the app will search for freelance web designers in Blackburn. You can also choose which search engine the app will use, Google, Bing or Yahoo.

I have been playing with this app for about five days and have found it to be really useful. I am getting to that point in life where my fingers have started to press two keys instead of one on my smartphone keyboard and so the ability to not have to type is fantastic.
I do find that you have to speak slowly and clearly but even so the voice recognition software has virtually no trouble understanding my Lancashire accent. My main use has been to use Vlingo to update Facebook and Twitter. I have learnt that the longer you speak for the more likely Vlingo is to make mistakes in its voice recognition. However, if you keep things short and sweet (can you do anything else with Twitter?) then it is very accurate. Vlingo displays it’s interpretation of your commands in a text box allowing you the opportunity to amend the text if it has made a mistake before you post your update to the world.
The app is freemium. The free version allows you to search the web, update Facebook and Twitter. The paid version also allows you to send texts and emails. The cost is £3.99 for either text or email or £5.99 for both.
There is a syntax that you need to get the hang of to really get the most out of this app but it is worth the effort. Vlingo is a great app and one that I would thoroughly recommend.
Vlingo is available from both the Apple App Store and the Android Marketplace.
  • Share/Bookmark

Facebook Rumours

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010
Facebook Event

Facebook Event currently taking place, what new features will they announce?

Anytime now there is going to be an announcement by Facebook, but what are they planning to launch? There are a plethora of rumours doing the rounds at the moment. What is known is that Facebook employees have been on “lockdown” for a couple of months so it is likely to be something major. Indeed there was even a clock in Facebook’s HQ that was counting down to today.

One of the major rumours is that Facebook is about to launch its own phone that runs an enhanced version of Facebook. Personally I think this is unlikely. I think this is simply people thinking “what have Google done recently?” and taking two and two and making twenty two. Having said that with the launch of Facebook Places then perhaps it would make sense to have a Facebook Phone that will allow users to check in at multiple venues.

There are also strong rumours of a revamp of the site. I think I can confirm that there will be some sort of announcement around new features. This afternoon on my web design page (www.facebook.com/blackburnwebdesign) there appeared a new tab called “wallpaper”, when I tried to access the tab my browser just crashed. So what would a wallpaper tab allow you to do? The obvious answer is to allow users to choose their own wallpaper. You can already do this on Twitter. I think that it is possible that they will announce a capability to personalise a lot of your page. Not just the background, but also the colour scheme to. The top menu bar may well be standard but below that I think you may be able to edit a lot of the presentational aspects of your profile. It may even include the choice of various templates to radically alter the layout of your page. Think what a WordPress theme is like and the way you can adjust where particular features like a calendar or tag cloud are displayed.

The downside to this would be that at the moment you know where everything is on a profile page if users can change the layout then it may lead to some confusion.

I think they may also announce enhanced integration between Facebook Places and existing Fan Pages. This would be a real advantage to a lot of companies to stop their Facebook presence becoming too fragmented.

I think that Facebook’s eventual aim is to control all of our access to the Internet, not through tiered access but by creating a silo. You log into Facebook when you switch your machine on and you stay in it all day. This would be an advertisers dream, knowing exactly where people will be and having the ability to profile users so that their advertising is targeted to specific users in specific locations.

I am sure we will all know very shortly, but if they do change the layout in anyway then there will undoubtedly be a backlash. Remember when they last changed the layout three years ago? It seemed like everybody and their dog was forming and joining groups to force Facebook to revert to their original design.

  • Share/Bookmark