Posts Tagged ‘Google’

iPhone 5 Launch Event Scheduled for October 4th 2011 – Let’s Talk iPhone

Wednesday, September 28th, 2011
The invite for the Apple "Let's Talk iPhone" event

The invite for the Apple "Let's Talk iPhone" event

It looks as though the long awaited launch of the iPhone 5 is finally almost upon us. Apple have been sending out invitations to a special event that will take place next Tuesday at 6pm UK time. The invite says the event is called “Let’s talk iPhone” and so it is very likely to be the time that the latest incarnation of the worlds most popular smartphone is revealed to the world.

Obviously there is an awful lot of hype and rumour surrounding the new device which most people thought would be launched back in June. The launch event will be headed up by Aplle’s new CEO Tim Cook following Steve Jobs stepping down as CEO earlier this year. Many people will be looking to see if Apple will be steering a new course under their new captain. I doubt this to be the case though as Tim Cook had long been thought to be Jobs’ eventual successor.

One other rumour is that the event will also be used to launch Facebook’s iPad app and also a revamped version of its iPhone app. Apple and Facebook do seem to be getting cosier and cosier with each other. This is probably mainly due to them both having a common competitor in Google. For Apple the challenge is to keep selling more iPhone handsets and this is threatened by the ever increasing market share that Google’s Android mobile operating system has. Meanwhile Facebook are facing some real competition from Google+, the new social networking site from Google.

One commonly held belief is that the launch will take place on October 4th and the new iPhone 5 will be available in both the UK and the US from October 15th. There are suggestions that the new model will have a teardrop shape when viewed in profile.  It may also be the case that the iPhone 5 will have closer integration with iCloud, allowing you to store music, photos, apps and calendars and then push the data to multiple devices.

The wait is nearly over and I am sure that all will be revealed next week.

  • Share/Bookmark

Google Incorporates Weather Into Google Maps

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

The search giant Google has now added weather conditions to Google maps. Simply go to http://maps.google.co.uk and you will see a map of your world region.

Opening screen of Google Maps

Opening screen of Google Maps

In the top right of the screen is a drop-down menu with the word “Traffic”, hover over the menu and you will see there are other options, select “Weather”.

The drop down menu in Google Maps that shows the weather options

Choose "Weather" from the drop-down menu

Now you will get a weather map showing cloud overlain on your map. In addition you can see current weather conditions for major locations on your map.

Google Maps details showing clouds

You can see the weather front with the cloud formation

You can also click on the weather conditions for a location and get a four day forecast

Four day weather forecast for Blackburn

The four day weather forecast for Blackburn

How accurate the forecast is I cannot say but Google say that it will help you plan visits to locations that you might want to see.

There are configuration options on the left side of the screen that allow you to change features such as temperature from Fahrenheit to Celsius or wind speed from MPH to KPH. You can also disable clouds as well.

It is another way in which Google are trying to keep you locked into Google. I believe that they have realised that when it comes to dominance of the web that Facebook has an advantage because people live in Facebook while they use Google as a start point to their web travels. Google still needs to find a way to fully integrate everything into one seamless ecosystem although the black menu bar at the top of the screen when you are logged into your Google account does go a long way towards achieving this. Google still dominates the web in many ways and search engine optimisation nearly always refers to ranking highly with Google. The rise of social media has produced a new frontier on the Internet and gaining control of it will be worth billions of pounds in the coming years. Google have realised that they cannot just sit on their laurels and are now actively pursuing the social market.

Google have produced this video to introduce this feature:

Google Maps introduces weather

My only real concern with this is the amount of rain Blackburn is going to get over the next couple of days. Ah well, it’s set to clear up for the weekend!

  • Share/Bookmark

Google Updates +1 Button Making It More Social

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011
Google Plus One Button

Update your Google +1 button to make it more social

Google have quietly made an improvement to their +1 Button. For those that do not know what the +1 button is it works in a very similar way to a Facebook Like button. When you are on a page that you like, and you have a Google account, then you can +1 the button (assuming that it is present) to say that you are voting for this page to say that the information on it is useful.

The improvement that Google have made to the +1 button is that now you can see annotations about which of your other Google friends have liked a page when you hover your mouse over the +1 button. This means that the +1 button becomes more social than it was before.

This at first sight seems to be a very minor change but is likely to help increase the use of the +1 button on websites. If the +1 button starts to gain more traction on the web then it is also likely to help increase the uptake to Google+ as well.

This is just another step towards Larry Page’s vision for Google to become more of a social company. Google are probably going to build more social signals into their search algorithm so that we, the users of the web, have a greater say in what the highest ranked sites are in organic results. It does make sense to use the pages that your friends have +1ed appearing higher in SERP’s than they would possibly have done otherwise asy our friends generally have the same interests as yo and so the pages that they like on the Net are likely to also be popular with yourself. It’s a win-win for Google and their users.

I have already updated the code for the +1 button on my site. You would need to do the same to take advantage of this feature. You can get a Google +1 button from this Google Webpage. If you are not sure how to do this then feel free to drop me a line on my contact page and I will do my best to help you out.

  • Share/Bookmark

Google To Buy Motorola Mobility, What’s In It For Google?

Tuesday, August 16th, 2011

The tech world went wild yesterday upon the news that Google is looking to buy the manufacturing arm of Motorola, Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion. The deal has not yet been fully ratified but is expected to be completed by the end of the year or early in 2012 at the latest. Google, of course, are behind the Android mobile operating system and have in the past said that they would never manufacture their own mobile phones. Why the change of heart? A lot may well be down to the on-going battle that they are having with both Apple and Microsoft. Google have accused the other two of trying to kill off Android through the use of patent infringement. In buying Motorola Mobility they also acquire an awful lot of patents. This would tie in nicely with Google’s buying strategy of late, including purchasing over 1000 it purchased from IBM and an attempt to purchase more than 6000 patents from Nortel.

The reason that Google might want to buy patents is to help protect itself from extremely costly lawsuits. By having a whole raft of patents in its arsenal Google can ward off potential lawsuits from other companies by looking for ways the other company has infringed on Google owned patents and then counter suing the company. The world of patents is very like the Cold War in the terminology that is used, including Mutually Assured Destruction. This is where one company can sue for damages that are so great that it would drive another company out of business and the other company can counter sue with the same result and this mean that neither company will eve r take the risk. Hence owning patents can be very beneficial for a company. Google has realised that it is very vulnerable to this sort of attack and over the last six months in particular has been very busy buying patents.

Motorola while still a major player in the mobile space is not the behemoth that it once was. If you go back to the mid 90’s then the major phone manufacturers were Motorola and Nokia. Google might well fancy having a crack at getting Motorola back to that once dominant position again. They would be able to market mobile devices, both phones and tablets, offering the ultimate Android experience. They might even start to look at attacking Microsoft’s hold on the enterprise market. With more and more services being offered via The Cloud then why not offer the scalability that The Cloud can offer to businesses of all sizes. Google would be able to provide the platform via the Chrome operating system for desktop workstations and mobile devices running the Android operating system. It is likely that Chrome and Android will eventually become more unified possibly even becoming one ecosystem.

The markets responded favourably to the news, with a number of companies seeing jumps in their share prices including Sony Ericsson, Samsung and Huawei who all manufacture Motorola phones. Other phone manufacturers that use the Android operating system such as HTC and LG Electronics also so share prices rise on announcement on the Google acquisition.

  • Share/Bookmark

British Library Agrees Deal With Google

Monday, June 20th, 2011

British Library agrees deal with Google to digitise 250 000 documentsGoogle has long wanted to make the sum of human knowledge available on line and today took one more step towards that eventual aim when it announced that it had agreed a deal with the British Library in London to make available over the internet around 250 000 texts.

The texts date back as far as the 18th Century and are all out of copyright. The documents are from 1700 – 1870 and under the terms of the agreement will be available on both the British Library’s website as well as on Google Books. It is likely to take a number of years to digitise all of the works selected.

The cost of digitising all the documents will be covered by Google. The 250 000 documents to be scanned are a tiny fraction of those that the British Library houses which is in excess of 150 million items.

Although some purists may baulk at the idea of this sort of historical information being available online it will prove to be of great value to many people all over the world who will have a chance to examine documents without having to incur the expense of travelling to London. The British Library was itself set up to try to provide knowledge to everybody and this deal will help them remain true to their original roots. In many ways it is a similar ideal to that of Google. What we are seeing is a merging of old and new media.

In completing this task we move one step closer to having a universal repository of knowledge that hopefully will be able to be accessed by anybody, anywhere and at any time. I believe that sometimes being in the presence of a historical document or artefact can have an emotional impact on an individual but that should not detract from the value of this project. As time goes by these documents will become more fragile and will not be capable of being handled except with special permission meaning that only a very small number of academics are ever likely to see these documents. Digitising the documents will allow not just a lasting record of their contents to be maintained but may lead to discoveries that otherwise may have never been made through the greater accessibility to the works.

All too often history repeats itself and while I am not expecting Barrack Obama, David Cameron, Nicolas Sarkozy et al to read through these documents at least the documents will be available to give the people of today an insight into the world that the people of yesterday inhabited. Maybe, just maybe, we may be able to learn a thing or two from the past?

  • Share/Bookmark

Yellow Pages, Search Engines or Social Media, Who Do You Trust?

Tuesday, June 14th, 2011
Yell, Google, Bing, Facebook and Twitter

Who do you trust when searching for local businesses?

I read an interesting article today that claims that people trust The Yellow Pages more than they do search engines like Google, Bing and Yahoo. It is a US based survey but it claims that 84% of those who took part in the survey used The Yellow Pages to find a local business in the last year against 76% who used a search engine. Only 32% said that they used a social network such as Facebook and Twitter.

So why would this be? I think a lot of it might come down to The Yellow Pages being a longer established brand. If we are honest if you were looking for something back in the mid nineties then pretty much your only option was to use The Yellow Pages. Search engines were still a relatively new idea and it was relatively easy to manipulate their results. Add to that many local businesses did not have a web presence in those days so you had little option but to go for The Yellow Pages.

As time has passed then search engine algorithms have become more sophisticated and so their results are more relevant. Local businesses are all waking up to the fact that having a website, even in its most basic form, is a requirement nowadays. The Yellow Pages have not been idle though and they now have a strong online presence through yell.com.

The statistics quoted earlier are for both online and print versions of The Yellow Pages so that perhaps skews the figures slightly as you cannot get a paper version of Google or Bing. I think that it is a valid figure though as I have to confess that last year I needed a tree surgeon and I had already picked up The Yellow Pages and was thumbing through it before I thought to myself “Why am I not looking for this online?”

I should hang my head in shame at the reason I did not go online initially to conduct my search. My thought pattern was that I probably wouldn’t find a small business online and a quicker option would probably be to use The Yellow Pages. The point I am trying to make is that even though I work in new media and deal with local businesses every day, help to promote their businesses online every day I still thought I would have a greater choice out of The Yellow Pages. Oh, and it was the paper copy of The Yellow Pages, not the website that I was using. I did put my copy down and start to search online instead, with a good result I might add.

This shows how much we are creatures of habit. I used the paper copy because that is what I have always done. I had never even thought about searching on line for a local company prior to that. I do now always search online when looking for goods and services, but if it has taken me this long to get round to using the web how long will it take more casual internet users?

One other thought I had on these figures was that of trust. Figures are constantly being bandied about that only about a third of users will click on the paid for ads on a search engine result page (SERP). Yet The Yellow Pages is full of nothing but ads. The Yellow Pages do not do anything to check or endorse companies it is simply a directory and the company pays for their ad and chooses which section they want to be listed in. We all know that when we use The Yellow Pages we tend to choose the companies whose ads stand out the most. This is no objective way of choosing a company, Company A have a more eye catching ad than Company B and therefore Company A must be better than Company B. I wonder if over time people will start to trust paid for ads on SERP’s? One comment I heard a few weeks ago was from somebody who only clicks on the ads and their rationale was that if a company is prepared to pay for me to click on their link then they must be serious about wanting to do business with me.

Perhaps this sort of view is going to become more prevalent in the coming years and it may very well be worth local businesses start to consider using services like Google Adwords or Microsoft adCenter for Bing. The advantage for advertisers is that you can choose which search terms you want your ad to appear under, meaning really targeted advertising.

Only 32% said that they used social media to search for a local company. I believe that this is primarily because social media is where search engines where ten years ago. People know that they exist, they use them, but they do not yet trust their search results enough to go to these sites first when looking for goods and services. People are still more interested in being sociable with their friends rather than with brands or businesses. It will be up to businesses to offer something in return for liking their Facebook page or following their Twitter account. It is also fait to say that while most household names are on one or both of the major social networks many smaller businesses have not yet moved into the social space.

The growth of mobile may spur the development of local searches on line. Often when you are searching for a local product you are searching for a telephone number to speak to somebody and so it follows that having your telephone number in a clickable format on your ad or webpage is likely to help contact rates from prospective customers. They can find your business via a search engine and then being able to click on the telephone number will be easier than keying it in. Of course yell.com can also provide this functionality via their website too.

I have been so intrigued by the results of this survey that I have set up my own on my home page. You will find it half way down the page, please do answer the single question and let’s see if our results are the same here in the UK.

  • Share/Bookmark

Happy IPv6 Day

Wednesday, June 8th, 2011

Happy IPv6 DayEveryday seems to be designated a special day. There are literally hundreds of them with greater or lesser importance, there’s probably an” International Eat A Cake Day”. Today has been designated International IPv6 Day, which may sound a lot less interesting but will have a much greater effect on you than you may realise.

What’s IPv6 and why are we having a special day for it you may well be asking. Well it is one of those moments in time when we realise that we have totally underestimated something, a bit like when Bill Gates allegedly said “640K of RAM ought to be enough for anybody”. In this case we are talking about the number of IP addresses that can exist. An IP address is a unique number that is assigned to an individual device that is connected to the Internet, “IP” stands for Internet Protocol. The reason that we need IP addresses is so that individual devices can communicate with each other. If you send an email to me then you, and I, want to know that it will arrive on my machine and not somebody else’s. The IP address helps to alleviate this problem.

A good analogy would be the telephone system. Your house will probably have a landline. Notice I have said “probably”, I have been careful to use that word so some of my more pedantic friends do not start bombarding me with emails to say that they don’t have a landline and simply use their mobile device to do everything.  I’m starting to ramble, so let’s get back to the gripping subject of IP addresses…

You probably have a landline in your house and that telephone is assigned a specific telephone number so when I dial your number I know that the phone in your house will ring. IP addresses are very similar in nature. Websites are all assigned an IP address that will look something like 192.185.75.12, now trying to remember that type of number for every website you visit would not be easy so we instead use domain names and every domain name maps to a specific IP address. These are more like the way you store telephone numbers in your mobile, you don’t need to know the number we just choose the name because we remember names more easily than telephone numbers.

The problem that we currently have is that we are running out of IP addresses. IPv4, the current version can support approximately 4.3 billion addresses, which may sound like a lot but when you think that every device that is connected to the internet is allocated an IP address then you might be surprised that they have lasted this long. Think about how many devices you have? PC’s, Mac’s, Tablets, Netbooks, Printers, iPads, smartphones and more devices are able to connect to the Internet on a daily basis and all the IPv4 addresses are now accounted for, though they have not yet all been allocated. With the emerging technology markets of China and Africa meaning that literally billions of new devices will go online in the next few years then it is apparent that something needs to change and change fast.

Enter IPv6. This is a protocol that will allow far more items to be allocated IP addresses 3.4 trillion trillion trillion to be exact and they should keep us going for a good while longer. The purpose of today was to test the new system. Many major players on the web including Facebook, Google and Yahoo have signed up to take part in the day. Taking part means that these sites will provide versions of their sites that can be accessed either using IPv4 or IPv6. Most browsers and PC’s should have no problem accessing sites that use IPv6 but some routers may do. You can see if you will be affected by running the test that can be found at test-ipv6.com.

The test will run from 01:00 BST on 08 June 2011 until 01:00 BST on 09 June 2011. The time now is 18:19 and so far no major issues have been reported, but we may not know for sure until the techies have poured over their stats in the next couple of days.

In reality this is probably less exciting than the supposed Rapture that was supposed to happen a couple of weeks ago but potentially this could have more of an impact on you, me and everybody else in the online world.

If you have experienced anything, good or bad, regarding IPv6 Day then why not leave me a comment?

  • Share/Bookmark

Windows 8 – First Thoughts

Monday, June 6th, 2011

Microsoft Windows 8Microsoft released a video last week giving people a chance to see what Windows 8 is going to look like and how it will function. Here are my thoughts on what we have been able to see so far.

The interface is very like Windows Phone 7 rather than Windows 7. The start screen has a series of tiles that represent the various programs and applications that you have installed on your machine. One good feature about using tiles rather than icons is that you can put more information into a tile. So rather than just being able to click on a Calendar icon to open the application you can see details of your schedule within the tile, giving users a better overall experience.

Microsoft have created a new development platform based on HTML 5 and Javascript that should allow new applications that are based on touch. This is really forward thinking to my mind, bearing in mind how often Microsoft seem to be playing catch up nowadays. There is a real emphasis on touchscreen throughout the video and it appears to only pay lip service to desktop users. I do wonder how effective this interface will be when used with a standard keyboard and mouse.

One nice feature is “snapping”. This allows a user to switch between tasks by swiping from the side. The last app to be used is then brought onto the screen, but the current app continues to utilise most of the display real estate. Think about picture in picture functionality on a TV. The user can then decide the scaling of the two apps so that either can be larger or they can both be the same size on your screen.

Windows 8 will ship with Internet Explorer 10 and again this seems to be being aimed at the tablet market as there is more talk about it having a touch first UI. There is also a touchscreen keyboard to help with entering URL’s and this can be split in two to give a more ergonomic experience.

As usual Windows 8 will allow you to use your existing applications with it. You will also be able to access other machines on your local network, though this is hardly ground breaking technology.

The video finishes off with a pledge that they will be showing us all more features over the next year which may indicate that Windows 8 is due to launch in Q1 2012.

As the owner of an LG Optimus phone that runs Windows Phone 7 then I would say that this is an enhancement on that OS. It is certainly a brave choice to move away from what people are used to. People are notoriously fickle and even within the tech community, a community who you would expect to embrace change, I hear a lot of murmurings about how it is too different .

The entire video focuses on the touchscreen aspect of Windows 8 and does not demonstrate how it will work on a desktop. Now I have a theory about this. Either they have not yet created the functionality for running on a desktop or eventually Windows 8 will be aimed at the tablet and smartphone market. If you look at Google they are currently running Android alongside Chrome, Apple have iOS and MacOS, so could Microsoft also develop two operating systems, one for PC’s and one for mobile devices? It will almost certainly be the case that in the future desktop PC’s will become the preserve of the office, geeks and gamers while the majority of the population who do not need the full functionality of a PC will be using tablets. So it could make sense to have an OS for the two types of devices. Time will tell.

I would love to hear your views on the new Windows 8 video teaser, leave me a comment. If you have not yet seen the video you can view it here.

  • Share/Bookmark

Are Google, Bing and Yahoo Schema-ing against us?

Sunday, June 5th, 2011
Shema.org logo

Schema.org is supported by Google, Bing and Yahoo

When search engine giants all club together to make an announcement then you don’t have to be Einstein to figure out that the subject of the announcement is something that will affect rankings. In this case it is the announcement that they are all supporting schema.org.

The more a search engine understands the data that is being presented to it on a page the better it can index that data which in turn allows the search engine to provide better results when you carry out a search. Often when data is stored in a database it is in a very structured format, the kind that search engines adore. However, when the data is formatted onto a webpage then this structure is lost. If there was a way for a search engine to still be able to acce3ss this structured data then it would make data analysis more accurate and this is where schema.org comes in.

The intention of schema.org is to provide site owners with a series of tags and mark-ups that when used on web pages can be easily understood by search engines. At the moment there are schemas for:

  • CreativeWork,
  • Book
  • Movie
  • MusicRecording
  • Recipe
  • TVSeries
  • AudioObject
  • ImageObject
  • VideoObject
  • Event
  • Organization
  • Person
  • Place
  • LocalBusiness
  • Restaurant
  • Product
  • Offer
  • AggregateOffer
  • Review
  • AggregateRating

The basis of scemas is the itemscope element and this needs to be added to the HTML tag that encloses the data that we are highlighting to the search engine. There is also an item type which will be one of those listed above. Each item type can have a number of properties that are referred to in the syntax as “itemprop”.

I have had a little play today and created some data for my contact page using the following code:

<div itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Person”>

<span itemprop=”name”>Michael Walmsley<br/></span>

<img src=”http://www.mickwalmsley.com/media/michael_walmsley_website_designer.jpg” itemprop=”image” align=”right” />

<span itemprop=”jobTitle”>Freelance Web Designer<br/></span>

<span itemprop=”telephone”>0800 779 7829<br/></span>

<a href=”mailto:m...@mickwalmsley.co.uk” itemprop=”email”>

m...@mickwalmsley.co.uk</a><br/>

Michael’s home page: <a href=”www.mickwalmsley.com” itemprop=”url”>mickwalmsley.com</a>

</div>

From the above code you can see that I have identified myself to be of type “person” and that the properties I have used are:

  • Name
  • Image
  • Job Title
  • Telephone
  • Email
  • URL

This should help any bot that crawls my site to index my data as it can clearly identify key elements that help to describe me. You can see how the data looks by visiting the contact page of my website.

I have only just started to scratch the surface of schema’s in this article. They will become increasingly important to Google, Bing and Yahoo in the coming months and years and so it will be a topic you will really need to understand in order to attain the highest rankings possible for your website.

I would recommend that you check out the schema.org website or if you would like personal advice on the subject then feel free to call me on 0800 779 7829 to discuss your requirements.

  • Share/Bookmark